2020-21
Degree of Doctor of Health Professions Education
RESOLUTION
The Degree of Doctor of Health Professions Education is governed by Resolution No. 633 of the University Court, the provisions of which are as follows:
1. The Degree of Doctor of Health Professions Education (DHPE) may be awarded by the Senate of the University of Glasgow in the College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences (the College).
2. The Senate may make Regulations governing the award of the Degree, which are subject to the approval of the University Court. These shall be stated under 'Regulations'.
3. The early exit awards of Postgraduate Certificate, Postgraduate Diploma and Master of Science (MSc (Med Sci) Health Professions Education) are also included in the Regulations.
REGULATIONS
A candidate admitted to the Programme leading to the award of the Degree of Health Professions Education must follow the instructions issued by the relevant School and be aware of the content of the Programme Specification and the Programme Document which will contain further details on the Programme including further requirements associated with the award.
1. Admission
Before being considered for admission to study for the Degree of Doctor of Health Professions Education, a candidate must normally have obtained a First Class or Upper Second Class Honours MBChB, BVS, BDS, Bachelor of Nursing, BSc Degree or other equivalent qualification.
2. Duration of Study
2.1 The minimum period of study for the award of the Degree is one year of full-time study followed by two years of part-time study, or five years of part-time study.
2.2 The maximum period within which the Programme must normally be completed is six years from the date of initial registration.
2.3 A candidate who has not completed the Programme, and the duration of whose period of study has reached the limit prescribed in §2.2, may apply to the College Higher Degrees Committee (or equivalent) for permission to extend their period of study by a maximum of one year. Such application must be accompanied by evidence of the candidate’s progress and an explanation for the delay in completion, and must be supported by the candidate’s supervisor and the Programme Director. Where the candidate has fulfilled the minimum period of part-time study or full-time study required by the regulations, and has not submitted the thesis for examination, the candidate shall register as a writing-up student for the final session. If further supervision is required, the College may require the candidate to register as a full-time or part-time student.
3. Recognition of Prior Learning
Credit may be awarded towards the completion of the Programme for courses or examinations satisfactorily completed while following another programme at the University of Glasgow or at another institution. Such award will be made in accordance with procedures approved by the College Higher Degrees Committee and set out in the Programme Handbook, up to a maximum of 60 credits.
4. Structure of Programme
The programme will consist of two taught courses, each carrying a value of 60 credits, a dissertation carrying 60 credits, and a research project leading to the submission of a thesis or equivalent research portfolio. In other respects the taught courses, dissertation and research project will conform to the descriptions set out in the Programme Handbook.
5. Minimum Requirement for the Award of Credits
Credits for taught courses shall be awarded subject to the fulfilment of required conditions. The minimum requirements for the award of credits are set out in the Code of Assessment at §16.40 – §16.44 in the ‘University Fees and General Information for Students’ section of the University Regulations.
6. Progress
6.1 A candidate will be permitted to progress to preparation of the dissertation only if they have obtained a grade point average[1] of 12.0 or above in the taught courses described in §4 with at least 75% of the credits at grade D3 or above and all credits at grade F3 or above.
6.2 A candidate will be permitted to progress to commencement of the research project leading to submission of a thesis or equivalent research portfolio only if they have obtained a grade point average of 15.0 or above in the taught courses and dissertation described in §4.
7. Thesis or Research Portfolio
The thesis or research portfolio must be written in English and must consist normally of approximately 50,000 words. It must be the candidate’s own account of their research and must be accompanied by a declaration to this effect signed by the candidate.
Submission of the thesis should be completed electronically as directed by the Graduate School and must conform to University Library specifications published at: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/formattingyourthesis/. In all cases, the submission must include a summary of 250–1,000 words. The summary must be an adequate and informative abstract of the work, suitable for publication by the University.
In signing a submission form, the supervisor is confirming that the work was undertaken by the candidate. The wording of the form makes it clear that the supervisor's signature does not endorse that the work has been completed, nor does it indicate that the thesis has achieved the required standard for the award of the degree. A candidate may submit a thesis against the advice of the supervisor but in such cases the supervisor may state the position in a report submitted to the Convener of the Committee of Examiners.
If approved for the degree, one hard-bound copy of the thesis and one electronic copy shall be deposited with the University Library. Where agreed by the Graduate School and the Library, hard bound submission may be waived in favour of solely electronic submission. Any hard copy should normally be produced to the standard defined in BS4821:1990 available from the Library, and the electronic copy must conform to University Library specifications published at https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/formattingyourthesis/. It is the University's normal practice to make any bound copy available for consultation in the Library, and to permit computer download of the electronic copy through its repository service, Enlighten. Such access may, however, be restricted under provisions of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 or the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004.
8. Assessment
8.1 Each candidate will be assessed on all taught components of the Programme, on the dissertation, and on the thesis or research portfolio.
8.2 For each academic session, assessment and reassessment of the taught components is governed by the Code of Assessment which is contained in the ‘University Fees and General Information for Students’ section of the University Regulations published for that session.
8.3 An oral examination of the candidate must be held in the presence of all of the examiners of the thesis or research portfolio.
9. Examiners
The thesis shall be examined by one or more examiners appointed by the Senate from among the experienced academic staff of the University, and by one or more External Examiners appointed by the University Court on the recommendation of the Senate. No person who has been involved in the direct supervision of the research student may be appointed as an examiner. The internal examiner shall not undertake any duties which have been allocated to the Convener and shall act as an examiner in the normal way. In the case of a submission by a member of staff or a former member of staff two of the examiners must be external. A thesis may be examined by two external examiners without the appointment of an Internal Examiner, with the approval of the Dean of Graduate School.
10. Recommendation of the Examiners of the Candidate‘s Thesis or Research Portfolio
The examiners of the candidate’s thesis or research portfolio will recommend to the Higher Degrees Committee one of the following outcomes:
10.1 The Degree be awarded unconditionally.
10.2 The Degree be awarded subject to certain minor corrections of detail or of presentation specified by the examiners. These shall not involve changes of substance to the thesis or research portfolio. The corrections shall normally be carried out within one month of receipt of the specifications to the satisfaction of the internal examiner.
10.3 The Degree be awarded subject to certain changes of substance in a specific element or elements of the thesis or research portfolio specified by the examiners. These shall not involve a revision of the whole thesis or research portfolio or of a major proportion of it. They may, however, include a requirement to carry out a further period of research in order to strengthen the thesis or research portfolio. The revisions shall be carried out within a timescale determined by the examiners and shall be confirmed by all of the examiners.
10.4 The thesis or research portfolio as a whole is unacceptable. The candidate is invited to resubmit the thesis or research portfolio taking account of the comments of the examiners. The resubmitted thesis or research portfolio will be examined on one occasion only. It will be resubmitted within a timescale to be determined by the examiners but normally no later than 12 months after the date of the joint report notifying the candidate of the requirements for revision. A resubmission fee will be charged to cover the examining costs.
11. Requirements for the Exit Awards of Master of Science (Medical Science), Postgraduate Diploma and Postgraduate Certificate and Rules for Award of Distinction and Merit
11.1 A candidate will be eligible for the award of the Degree of Master of Science (Medical Science) Health Professions Education on obtaining a grade point average[1] of 12.0 or above in the 120 credits of taught courses described in §4, with at least 75% of these credits at grade D3 or above, and all credits at grade F3 or above, and obtaining a grade D3 or above in the dissertation.
11.2 A candidate will be eligible for the award of Merit on achieving at the first attempt:
a) a grade point average of at least 15.0 in the 180 credits completed on the programme comprising 120 credits of taught courses and the dissertation; and
b) a grade point average of at least 14.0 in the 120 credits of taught courses; and
c) a grade of at least C1 in the dissertation.
11.3 Where a candidate has satisfied the requirements set out at §11.2 (b) and (c), and their grade point average for the 180 or more credits completed on the programme at the first attempt falls within the range 14.1 to 14.9 the Board of Examiners shall have discretion to make the award with Merit.
11.4 A candidate will be eligible for the award of Distinction on achieving at the first attempt:
a) a grade point average of at least 18.0 in the 180 credits completed on the programme comprising 120 credits of taught courses and the dissertation; and
b) a grade point average of at least 17.0 in the 120 credits of taught courses; and
c) a grade of at least B1 in the dissertation.
11.5 Where a candidate has satisfied the requirements set out at §11.4 (b) and (c), and their grade point average for the 180 or more credits completed on the programme at the first attempt falls within the range 17.1 to 17.9 the Board of Examiners shall have discretion to make the award with Distinction.
11.6 The requirement for the award of a Postgraduate Diploma is a grade point average of 9.0 in 120 taught credits, with not less than 80 of these credits at grade D3 or above.
11.7 The requirement for the award of a Postgraduate Certificate is a grade point average of 9.0 in 60 taught credits, with not less than 40 of these credits at grade D3 or above.
11.8 The Postgraduate Diploma and Postgraduate Certificate may be awarded with Merit or Distinction where a candidate has achieved at the first attempt a grade point average of 15.0 or above, or a grade point average of 18.0 or above, respectively. The Board of Examiners shall have the discretion to make the award with Merit or Distinction where the grade point average falls within the range 14.1 to 14.9, or 17.1 to 17.9, respectively.
[1] The grade point average is determined with reference to the schedule of grades and grade points contained in Schedule A and Schedule B of the University’s Code of Assessment. The grade point average is calculated by taking the product of each course’s weight and the candidate’s grade points and dividing the sum of these products by the sum of the courses’ weights. The weights shall correspond to the courses’ credit ratings unless specified otherwise in the relevant programme documentation. The grade point average is expressed to one decimal place (§16.34(a) of the Code of Assessment). In determining whether a candidate has satisfied requirements in relation to progress and award, no further rounding is permitted. For example, a grade point average of 11.9 would not satisfy a requirement for a grade point average of 12.0.