Dying in the Margins
Uncovering the reasons for unequal access to home dying for the socio-economically deprived
This 3 year research project is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. Our aim is to examine experiences of home dying for people living in poverty in the UK in both urban (Glasgow) and rural (Dumfries & Galloway) locations.
There is consistent evidence that most people would prefer to die at home and that this is seen as a cultural marker of a 'good death'.
Whilst there has been recent success in some countries, including the UK, in reducing hospital deaths and increasing deaths at home, these gains have not benefitted everyone.
Notably, people from more socio-economically deprived areas in the UK have been shown to be less likely to die at home compared to patients from higher socio-economic areas, and this gap is widening.
People from socio-economically deprived areas are also less likely to die in a hospice and to access specialist palliative care, are more likely to be admitted to hospital in the last 3 months of life, and bereaved relatives report lower satisfaction levels with care received.
And yet, the reasons for this inequality are not well understood.
The overarching aim of the research is to examine barriers to, and experiences of, home dying for people living in poverty in the UK in both urban and rural locations. There has been very little research, either nationally or internationally, which illuminates the relationship between socio-economic deprivation and end of life experience, including home dying, and this project seeks to redress this knowledge gap.
We will recruit participants who are both living in an area of socio-economic deprivation and who self-identify as 'struggling to make ends meet'.
1. To understand the home environment and lived experience at end of life for people who are socio-economically deprived.
2. To examine, in a participatory way involving people who are socio-economically deprived and are at the end of their life, or recently bereaved:
a) how the home environment is perceived, modified, and made use of over the course of the illness trajectory
b) the influence of type of housing and material resources on end of life experiences and ability to die at home
c) similarities and differences in experience within and between the urban and rural context.
3. To initiate a public debate across a range of audiences and opinion-formers regarding the barriers to, and experiences of, home dying and to provide innovative solutions to reduce those barriers, using the voices, images and narratives of people experiencing poverty.
There is considerable evidence supporting the value of images in knowledge translation and impact generation. There are no images currently in UK contemporary palliative care policy which speak to the experience of dying in circumstances of socio-economic deprivation.
In the study, we will use a range of participatory visual methods, including:
Photovoice is a participatory visual method designed to engage and empower participants, promote dialogue and reach policymakers. Our research participants will take photos of the things that are meaningful to them and their day-to-day experiences in their homes. These images will then be discussed with the researcher at various touchpoints. They will be used to identify what matters most to participants, and any barriers or difficulties they are experiencing in their home environment.
Digital storytelling is a form of co-production offering people the opportunity to create multi-media narratives about an important life experience. Workshops comprise the following components: 1) oral story sharing and transcription; 2) script writing from the transcript; 3) story script editing; 4) story voice overs; 5) collection of images and videos; 6) story production; 8) editing; 9) approval of the final products. Each facilitated component is participant-led. Importantly, participants require little or no prior experience in digital media to create their stories.
A Photographic Artist
We will commission a professional artist to work with participants who are dying and their families to create images to convey aspects of their experience they want to share but were not able to capture photographically themselves.
Co-created images and digital stories will be presented to, and discussed with, stakeholders at large-scale exhibitions at the Scottish Parliament, in central Glasgow, in hospital education centres, and in rural community venues.
Related Items on Our Blog
Principal Investigator (University of Glasgow)
Lecturer (School of Interdisciplinary Studies)
Contact: Naomi.Richards@glasgow.ac.uk / 01387 702063
Dr Naomi Richards is Lecturer in End of Life Studies at the University of Glasgow. Prior to joining Glasgow in 2015, she held positions at the University of the West of Scotland and the University of Sheffield. Naomi is a social anthropologist specialising in death and dying, ageing and old age, and visual and ethnographic methods. Over the last decade she has been funded by the ESRC to undertake empirical and theoretical investigations into the UK right-to-die debate and the phenomenon of old age rational suicide. She is also involved in two Wellcome Trust funded case studies. The first examines the relationship between palliative care and assisted dying in three jurisdictions where the practice is lawful. The second examines the global transfer and translation of the Death Café phenomenon.
Research Associate (University of Glasgow)
Dr Jane Rowley joined the End of Life Studies group in 2020. She previously held positions as a Senior Research Fellow at Staffordshire University, Lecturer in Research at the Centre for Addiction Studies and Lead for Clinical Communication (2) on the MBChB AT THE University of Liverpool. She is a visiting lecturer on the Doctorate in Education at Staffordshire University. Jane completed her Doctoral research in Adult Education and Addiction Recovery in October 2012. This work explored how adult education may aid a person in addiction recovery, in particular how our human connections and kindness can support a person’s recovery journey – however they choose to define it. Recently she has worked on projects supporting people living with dementia to establish peer support groups, as a clinical supervisor to military charities and has engaged in two funded education research programmes around pupil aspirations and early years’ pedagogy.
Research Lead (Marie Curie Hospice, Glasgow)
Dr Emma Carduff is the Research Lead at Marie Curie Hospice, Glasgow. She trained as a nurse at the University of Glasgow and completed a Master’s degree in Public Health Research, then a PhD in research methods for palliative care research from the University of Edinburgh. Dr Carduff is responsible for facilitating, managing and leading research activity at the hospice and collaborates with academic colleagues nationally and internationally. Her particular research interest is the health and wellbeing of unpaid carers of people with terminal illness and she is Advocate Member for the International Palliative Care Family Carer Research Collaboration (IPCFRC) for Scotland. Dr Carduff is also passionate about ensuring equality in end of life experience for those in marginalised groups, including those living with socio-economic deprivation, homelessness and prisoners. In addition, Dr Carduff has experience of working collaboratively with patient and public involvement groups within organisations and those established for specific projects.
Associate Head - Research (Te Arai Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group)
Merryn directs the Te Arai Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group based at the University of Auckland. The group conducts multi-disciplinary bicultural research using creative social research methods to inform practice, policy, and teaching in palliative and end of life care both nationally and internationally. Merryn has been conducting research with older people for over 20 years and has a particular interest in developing models of palliative and end of life care to meet the needs of ageing populations. Her research programme has been supported by substantial grants from the HRC, UK Department of Health, Research Councils and Health Charities.
Blunt, A. & Dowling, R. 2006. Home. Routledge; London.
Buck J., Webb, L., Moth, L., Morgan, L. & Barclay, S. 2018. Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 0:1–8.
Davies JM, Sleeman KE, Leniz J, Wilson R, Higginson IJ, Verne J, et al. 2019. Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta- analysis. PLoS Med 16(4): e1002782. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002782
Dixon J, King D, Matosevic T, Clark C, Knapp K. 2015. Equity in the provision of palliative care in the UK: review of evidence. Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
Gao, W., Ho, Y., Verne, J., et al. 2013. Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population- Based Study. PLoS Med, [online] 10(3), p.e1001410.
Koffman, J., Burke, G., Dias, A., et al. 2007. Demographic factors and awareness of palliative care and related services. Palliative Medicine. 21(2), pp.145-153.
Lewis, J.M,. DiGiacomo, M., Currow, D.C. & Davidson, P.M. 2011. Dying in the margins: Understanding palliative care and socioeconomic deprivation in the developed world. Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, 42(1):105-118.
Macfarlane, M & Carduff, E. 2016. Does place of death vary by deprivation for patients known to specialist palliative care services? BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 0; 1-2.
Wang, C. & Burris, M. 1997. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education Behaviour, 24(1): 369-387
Williams, L., Gott, M., Moeke-Maxwell, T., et al. 2017. Can digital stories go where palliative care research has never gone before? A descriptive qualitative study exploring the application of an emerging public health research method in an indigenous palliative care context. BMC Palliative Care, 16